Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-10-21 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-10-21 House Journal Page 4830 HB 136 The following letter, dated June 29, 1996, was received: Dear Speaker Phillips: Under authority of art. II, sec. 15, of the Alaska Constitution, I have vetoed the following bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 136(FIN) am(efd fld) An Act relating to the establishment and operation of the Alaska Railroad Commission to determine whether sale of the Alaska Railroad is in the best interest of the state. 1996-10-21 House Journal Page 4831 HB 136 While this legislation does not mandate the sale of the Alaska Railroad, it sets up a costly and time-consuming study of railroad assets and possible sale procedures. Frankly, I dont think this type of study is merited, nor do I think a sale in the near future would be in the best interest of the state. The railroad has been acknowledged as a success. This state-owned corporation started more than 11 years ago in the red. Since then it has consistently turned a profit and required no operating dollars from the state. I think much of the success of the railroad can be attributed to the independent management structure, which was designed by the legislature in the act setting up the Railroad Corporation in 1984. Many of the questions surrounding management and finances of the railroad were addressed in a comprehensive evaluation directed by the legislature in 1994. This study concluded that the railroad is performing well and meeting its statutory mandates. I would commend this study for re-reading. Although the act establishing the Railroad Corporation called for a report every five years, providing evidence of at least three sale attempts by the railroad, this language was deleted by the legislature in 1988. Unchanged under the 1984 law is the provision that the state run the railroad with the intention it would be privatized at some later date. I agree that this prospect must be provided for. I also agree the Board should seriously consider and pursue any bonafide offer by a credible buyer. Under the law, any sale proposal would be brought to the legislature for approval. Such offers should be pursued in a normal business manner with necessary appraisals and studies funded by the parties to the potential sale. The public interest must also be weighed in any sale proposal. The railroad is uniquely Alaskan and has been responsive to the needs and desires of communities, businesses and citizens along its tracks while making a profit. A private owner may or may not continue to operate this way in its pursuit of the bottom line. As a result, it is not 1996-10-21 House Journal Page 4832 HB 136 surprising many Alaska residents, businesses and municipalities in the Railbelt have urged my veto of this legislation. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor